News RSS Feed


Pupils as young as eight excluded from Kingston schools for sexual misconduct

Pupils as young as eight have been excluded from Kingston schools for sexual misconduct, an investigation has revealed.

Two primary school pupils aged eight and nine were suspended in the category, which includes sexual abuse, sexual assault and lewd behaviour.

The eight-year-old, who is a special education needs (SEN) pupil, and the nine-year-old, who needs help from a specialist teacher, were both given two-day suspensions.

According to the figures obtained by the Surrey Comet, the children were among 15 pupils excluded from schools in the borough for sexual misconduct in the past three years.

Kingston Council, which looks after schools in the borough, said it could not reveal further information on the two incidents due to data protection laws but said the length of the exclusion would “suggest” a lewd comment had been made.

However, child psychologist Oliver Foster, who has worked with children from Kingston, said the exclusion of an SEN child for sexual misconduct was likely to be for a serious incident rather than just a lewd comment.

He said: “Taking an SEN child out would be a very serious measure for a school to take. It could risk further isolation and is one only undertaken if the school believes the child was at risk or posed a risk to others.

“There are many issues facing children connected with their learning difficulties and a possible problem might be more vulnerable sexualised media content.

“However, in the circumstances described, it would be advisable to look at the significance of the incident to the child, rather general issues such as cultural or social influences.”

However, one female teacher, who did not want to be named, said aggressive marketing and exposure to sexual imagery on the internet and on television encouraged children to copy sexual behaviour.

The teacher, who has taught at a primary school in Kingston, said: “We try to help these youngsters but when they are bombarded at home on the television and on the internet with sexual pictures and aggressive behaviour, youngsters, in particular the more vulnerable ones, will copy what they see.”

Councillor Patricia Bamford, executive member for safeguarding children, said that while sexualized content was a “challenge for schools” they were equipped to “deal with issues of this nature as they arise”.

Comments(1)

NewKingstonian says...
9:12am Mon 30 Jan 12

There is something very sad about this story, a school which is excluding a pupil of eight for sexual misconduct seems to me to be failing to manage things appropriately. I would doubt the child understood the nature of their actions and equally doubt they understood why they were excluded.

The culture of sexual impropriety at every turn seems alive and well and I think this decision is a sad reflection on those who concurred with it and implemented it. Whatever happened to the innocence of children and the age of reason?

Political correctness is the antithesis of intellectual reasoning. Discuss.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree