News RSS Feed


English Heritage backs Jolly Boatman plans

4:40pm Thursday 21st August 2008

comment Comments (3)   Have your say »

By Chris Wickham »

Plans to redevelop a controversial site close to Hampton Court Palace moved a step closer this week when the organisation which protects the country’s historic environment backed the plans.

As English Heritage announced it was withdrawing its objections to the redevelopment of the area around Hampton Court Station - opposite the palace - the Royal British Legion put forward a grant of £2.05 million to Royal Star and Garter Homes to support a dementia care wing at the planned new care home, which is part of the proposed development.

An updated proposal drawn up by developer the Gladedale Group, in consultation with Network Rail and the homes was submitted to Elmbridge Council in June to run alongside a planning application put in last October after concerns were raised about the first set of designs.

English Heritage has said this scheme - which includes a refurbished station building, a different hotel design and the care home - is “acceptable” in principle and Gladedale has also received the support of the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (Cabe), the Government’s urban design adviser.

In a letter to Elmbridge Council, Cabe state: “The current, neglected, status of the site, with the low quality station entrance and car park, poor public realm and highways infrastructure, is clearly unacceptable.

“The scheme greatly improves the public realm and transport interchange facilities, and has the potential to be an extremely pleasant place to visit and live.”

Tim Jones, from English Heritage, stated in an official response: “The designs submitted represent the most appropriate response to the site.”

Hampton Court Rescue Campaign, founded to fight previous proposals for the site - known as the Jolly Boatman site - believe the site should remain as open space and submitted a 3,000 signature petition to the council earlier this month.

Paul Lemar, land and planning director for Gladedale Group, said: “The endorsement of English Heritage and CABE is enormously important for the project and rather undermines the arguments of opponents who claim that the development will have a detrimental impact on the views from the palace.”

If the new home for ex-servicemen and women gets the go-ahead it will house 60 elderly and frail former members of the armed forces and will include a 13-bed dementia care wing, the construction of which will be covered by the grant.

  • What do you think? Post your comments below.

Your Say YourLocal Guardian

gertrude grendal, Barnes says...
4:36pm Sat 30 Aug 08

Reading about fears that Gunnesbury Park may be used for houses, I fear for Kew Gardens. Having just returned from the once beautiful gardens, which used to be full of flowers and well-kept flower and shrub beds, what did I find. The roses have been removed, because of blight and siease, with the promise that they will be restored. By the lake, the beds which once contained lovely flowers are now filled with wild flowers. Very nice, but hardly worth the high cost of a ticket to see what can be found on a roadside verge. Instead of flowers, we now have up-in-the=tree-top walks - but who wants to be either a monkey or a parrot - maybe the planners? With flowers vanishing, and ugly buildings, such as the latest monstrosity next to the smaller water colour painting house, one's fears grow. I complained once that Kew Gardens was being converted into a theme park, now I dread the time we hear that Kew Estate is offering luxury housing with a couple of "affordable" units to squash complaints. This letter may sound ridiculous, but with the dictators taking over our way of life and traditions, nothing is impossible. We should watch very carefully.

Fred1, Surbiton says...
7:12pm Sat 30 Aug 08

Kew Gardens? Hmm - are we talking about the same development here?

Granted, it's not exactly clear where the Jolly Boatman site is. However, I suspect that it's probably the patch of land immediately downstream from Hampton Court Bridge, on the southern bank of the river, since that's the only patch of land I can see on satellite photos that fits all the rather vague descriptions I've heard.

Nevertheless, it's still a very long way from Kew Gardens.

It's got to be said, something seriously needs to be done about the road junction at this point, which is absolutely terrifying for pedestrians.

gertrude grendal, Barnes says...
12:48am Sun 31 Aug 08

Fred1
No, I wasn't referring at all to the development you mention. Sorry if my letter wasn't clear. I was writing about what COULD happen if building was allowed to take place on protected cherished lands.

Your sayYourLocal Guardian

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Surrey Comet account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?
English Heritage backs Jolly Boatman plans English Heritage backs Jolly Boatman plans

An artist's impression of the site

Chief executive RS&G Lynn McDougall, Vice-Admiral Sir John Dunt RS&G, Peter Clemison and Chris Simpkins from the Royal British Legion



Sponsored Links


Local Services


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »